My posts on StockTwits

[curncman]

My posts on ST for the sake of forum members who dont have access to ST....

[TimGDixon]

Bruh. you're a complete looney ahhahaha - now I can't vouch for $2 anymore than I can for $4 but TSOI is nowhere near its true value so you could be right on or way off...

But maybe, just maybe, if Tim & Tim go to prison (guess he is referring to my grandson Tim) and a reputable CEO takes over and reverses these billions of shares... lets explore that shall we...what would a reputable CEO do. Koos just did one at 1:1500 - he's reputable so lets see, 1:1500

2,734,250,749 / 1500 = 1,822,833
1,500 x 0.003 = $4.50 pps

Suppose you had 1,000,000 shares Curncman you would now have 666 shares @ $4.50 good deal? Koos is reputable so it seems good to me.
Lets say though this new reputable CEO needed 20 million in funding for clinical trials and the stock is at 4.50 he/she would need to sell 4,444,444 shares bringing the issued and outstanding to 6,267,277 and the new investor would own 70.91% of the company - good deal eh? But we all know that reverses don't hold their price unless you are profitable and cash flow positive with EPS. Lets suppose the retrace takes it down to $3.00 a share and you still need to raise that money - you've effectively lost the company either way because the new investors own the majority.

The next statement is even more entertaining - these are the people who have repeatedly bashed everything we do and have repeatedly stated everything we have is worthless but now all of a sudden i'm moving valuable assets to other spin-offs. What makes them valuable? Who determines their value? Why, we do. BRTH is currently valued at $48,900,000 and we own 51%. RENO is currently valued at $14,450,000 and we own 69%. CNSI is valued at $34,095,000 and we own 45%. ALLO we own 100%.

BRTH is using one indication from one patent to investigate COPD.
RENO is using one indication from one patent to investigate breast cancer.
CNSI has 11 patents filed specifically for that company to investigate neurodegenerative diseases.

Whats been licensed is a fraction of our portfolio and has always had value to us even when the soothsayers preach otherwise.

So who among you wants to do a reverse?

slum11.png (112.43 KiB) Viewed 250 times

[TimGDixon]

Its all relative right ?

2,734,250,749 / 1500 = 1,822,833
1,500 x 0.003 = $4.50 pps

Suppose you had 1,000,000 shares Curncman you would now have 666 shares @ $4.50 good deal? Don't fight it slummustheprophetboi said it was the mark of the beast so just accept it. You're 1m shares are worth the same $2,997 right so whats the biggie? But now we're going to dilute the heck out of it raising $$$. Its all good because now we have billions of shares to fund into the future. None of this would actually affect control, Dear Thomas and I would still control the vote no matter what. So we could do this today in the best interest of slummus and co. and yes we'd all get taken down but we won't have billions in the overhang.

[TimGDixon]

Its just apples to oranges or as some call it corn to dogs.

cd.png (693.49 KiB) Viewed 226 times

[TimGDixon]

Now suppose somewhere back down the line you had paid 100,000 for that 1,000,000 shares that are now reduced to 666 shares at $4.50 = $2,9997 - $100,000 = $97,003. Theres going to need to be some major movement to get back to principal value of $100,000. Stock will need to run to $145 a share to break even. How does all of this sound to you curncman? Should we do it?

[TimGDixon]

[Codycrusher]

Please never do a reverse split, losing most of my share value beyond the current share price will kill me and make me very upset and disappointed and I will not be happy at all.
I am okay with holding my current shares knowing if something big happens all my gains are returned back to normal or beyond.
But if you do a reverse split, there is no returning to normal for my share price, I pretty much lose almost all of my investment with a reverse split, I will be so unhappy with that.

[trader32176]

me neither cody.

i have hopes to see
something that crosses over the finish the line in a big way.

the natives are getting restless to see a pop here.

that part always attempts to bother me,

but i have always waited longer than most to see this stock get to the price range that Curncman suggests.

[TimGDixon]

Please never do a reverse split, losing most of my share value beyond the current share price will kill me and make me very upset and disappointed and I will not be happy at all.
I am okay with holding my current shares knowing if something big happens all my gains are returned back to normal or beyond.
But if you do a reverse split, there is no returning to normal for my share price, I pretty much lose almost all of my investment with a reverse split, I will be so unhappy with that.

you see now why we only sell stock once unlike the others.. i told all of you months before it happened celz would do at least two RS's and they did, I also told you RGBP would do at least one and they did... no i'm no prophetboi but i can read financials.

[trader32176]

celz would do at least two RS's and they did, I also told you RGBP would do at least one and they did

it didn't take any genius to predict those 2 stocks ahead . once a reverser, always one .

[Codycrusher]

Please never do a reverse split, losing most of my share value beyond the current share price will kill me and make me very upset and disappointed and I will not be happy at all.
I am okay with holding my current shares knowing if something big happens all my gains are returned back to normal or beyond.
But if you do a reverse split, there is no returning to normal for my share price, I pretty much lose almost all of my investment with a reverse split, I will be so unhappy with that.

you see now why we only sell stock once unlike the others.. i told all of you months before it happened celz would do at least two RS's and they did, I also told you RGBP would do at least one and they did... no i'm no prophetboi but i can read financials.

My concern and the problem is TSOI’s financials aren’t much better, at the rate TSOI’s share price is dropping aren’t we truly looking at a concerning and problematic road ahead of us, TSOI’s ability to operate and cover expenses is going to become a serious issue at this rate won’t it?
It’s very obvious and clear something needs to happen, ofcourse no reverse split but a buyout of a subsidiary or selling patents, something serious does need to happen to bring in some serious revenue.

I have a thought, so you know how there is a patent dispute against the master file patent, you said even if you lost the battle you have everything covered in individual patents, why don’t you offer to sell the master file patent to the people doing the lawsuit, I have heard that they have heap loads of money to spend and aren’t hurting, you could be like, we will make a 100 million dollar deal, I give you master patent you give TSOI 100 Milly or more.
I’m just saying it’s obvious they want that master file patent, instead of fighting them when you don’t really need it anymore, why not sell it to them and make a lot of money?
Good idea huh, I think it’s a very good idea.

[TimGDixon]

First off Cody you forget we have an executed agreement with GHS for 10 million over next 18 months so we are not worried about paying bills.

ghs.png (449.02 KiB) Viewed 170 times

I don't think you actually get the Restem deal.. that is a scheme and we're not getting into business with schemers. I'm just waiting for a ruling and the appeals that follow so we can legally jump into the middle and bust everything up.

[TimGDixon]

But keep on thinking Cody... if it wasn't for crooks and creeps your idea could be considered as rational.

[TimGDixon]

[curncman]

Its about time that truth prevails all over on ST