CHEERS TO HEALTH
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
China Is Building The World’s Largest Quarantine Camp In Guangzhou with 90,000 Isolation Pods — This Is The World Economic Forum’s ‘Role Model’ For The Global Community
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/1 ... community/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/1 ... community/
cablejohn45 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:56 am hERE IS A REAL KNEESLAPER FOR YOU
https://gab.com/disclosetv/posts/109393578729066008
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
TUCKER CARLSON, FOX NEWS: Here's something that we didn't know, but now do. In the winter of 2020, Tony Fauci wanted to know how the Chinese Communist Party was responding to COVID. They had COVID. We had COVID. He'd want to see what they were doing, so we sent one of his deputies, a man called Clifford Lane, to China to find out, and Lane seemed stunned by what he saw there.
Entire Chinese cities had been quarantined, the whole city. Huge numbers of people were forcibly locked inside their own homes, in some cases to starve to death. Secret police cruised the streets forcing pedestrians into windowless vans for the crime of being outside. Household pets, dogs and cats, were declared unclean and beaten to death on the sidewalk. It was a hellish dystopian scene.
So, Lane returned to the U.S. to tell Tony Fauci what he'd seen there. But Tony Fauci was not disgusted. He was not appalled by the human rights abuses that Clifford Lane had seen in China. According to a new report in The Epoch Times, based on depositions that emerged this month, Tony Fauci was envious. "This is what we have to do" in the U.S., Fauci told Wayne.
Entire Chinese cities had been quarantined, the whole city. Huge numbers of people were forcibly locked inside their own homes, in some cases to starve to death. Secret police cruised the streets forcing pedestrians into windowless vans for the crime of being outside. Household pets, dogs and cats, were declared unclean and beaten to death on the sidewalk. It was a hellish dystopian scene.
So, Lane returned to the U.S. to tell Tony Fauci what he'd seen there. But Tony Fauci was not disgusted. He was not appalled by the human rights abuses that Clifford Lane had seen in China. According to a new report in The Epoch Times, based on depositions that emerged this month, Tony Fauci was envious. "This is what we have to do" in the U.S., Fauci told Wayne.
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
https://www.theepochtimes.com/female-st ... 86038.html
Female Student Recalls Leaving Body After Doctors Fail to Save Her Life—But Returns, Wakes Up in Morgue
BY NDERF TIMEDECEMBER 4, 2022 PRINT
A computer programming student was undergoing surgery in Costa Rica, when she died, experienced the afterlife, then returned to her body—in the morgue.
Graciela H. shares her story on the Near Death Experience Research Foundation website. This story has not been independently verified.
During Surgery
I saw doctors working fast on me. … They were agitated. They took my VS [vital signs], did CPR. Everybody began to leave the room slowly. I didn’t understand why they were acting like that.
Everything was quiet. I decided to get up. Only my doctor stood in the same place, looking at my body. I decided to get closer, I was standing near him, I could feel he was sad and his soul was in pain. I remember touching his shoulder, then he left. …
My body began to elevate and elevate, I can say taken by a strange force.
It was great, my body was getting lighter and lighter. While going through the roof of the surgery room, I [discovered] I could move anywhere I [wanted].
I was pulled to a place where … [the] clouds [were] bright, a room or space. … All around me was light, very bright, and filling my body with energy, filling my chest with happiness. …
at my arms, [and they were the] same shape as human [arms], but different material. The material was as white gas mixed with [a] white glow, silver glow, pearl glow around my body.
I was beautiful. I had no mirror to see my face, but I … [could] feel my face was pretty, I saw my arms and my legs had a white, simple, long dress of light. … My voice was as a teenager mixed with [the] tone of voice as a child. …
Suddenly a light brighter than my body [approached] me. … His light was making me blind. …
He said in a very … fine voice, “You are not going to be able to continue.” …
I remember talking his same language with my mind, he spoke with his mind too.
[As I cried because I didn’t want to go back,] he picked me up, held me. … He was quiet the whole time, gave me strength. I felt love and energy. [There] Is no love and strength in this world [to] compare to that. …
[He said:] “You were sent here by mistake, somebody’s mistake. You need to go back. … To come here, you need to accomplish many things. … Try to help several people.” …
In the Morgue
I opened my eyes, everything around was metal doors, people on metal tables, one body had another body on top. I recognized the place: I was in the morgue.
I felt ice on my eyelashes, my body was cold. could not feel anything. … [I wasn’t] even able to move my neck or talk.
I was feeling sleepy. … [Two or three hours] later, I heard voices, [and I] opened my eyes again. I saw two male nurses. … I knew I had to make … eye contact with one of them. I barely had strength to blink my eyes again and again, but I did. [It] took a lot of energy.
[One of the nurses looked] at me, scared, … [telling] his partner: “Look, look, she is moving her eyes!” Laughing, [he] said, “Let’s go, this place is scary.”
Inside of me, I was screaming, “Please, don’t leave!”
I didn’t close my eyes until the nurses came, and doctors. All I heard is [someone say], “Who did this? Who sent this patient to the morgue? The doctors were mad. I closed my eyes until was sure I was far away from that place. I didn’t wake up until three or four days later.
I had episodes of sleeping for long periods of time. … I could not talk. [On] day five, I began to move [my] arms and legs … again. …
Doctors [explained] to me that I was sent there [to the morgue] by mistake. … They helped me to walk again, with therapy.
One of the things I learned is [there] is no time to waste doing the wrong things, we need to do everything good for our sake … [on] the other side. [It] is like a bank; you save that much, you will get that much at the end.
Female Student Recalls Leaving Body After Doctors Fail to Save Her Life—But Returns, Wakes Up in Morgue
BY NDERF TIMEDECEMBER 4, 2022 PRINT
A computer programming student was undergoing surgery in Costa Rica, when she died, experienced the afterlife, then returned to her body—in the morgue.
Graciela H. shares her story on the Near Death Experience Research Foundation website. This story has not been independently verified.
During Surgery
I saw doctors working fast on me. … They were agitated. They took my VS [vital signs], did CPR. Everybody began to leave the room slowly. I didn’t understand why they were acting like that.
Everything was quiet. I decided to get up. Only my doctor stood in the same place, looking at my body. I decided to get closer, I was standing near him, I could feel he was sad and his soul was in pain. I remember touching his shoulder, then he left. …
My body began to elevate and elevate, I can say taken by a strange force.
It was great, my body was getting lighter and lighter. While going through the roof of the surgery room, I [discovered] I could move anywhere I [wanted].
I was pulled to a place where … [the] clouds [were] bright, a room or space. … All around me was light, very bright, and filling my body with energy, filling my chest with happiness. …
at my arms, [and they were the] same shape as human [arms], but different material. The material was as white gas mixed with [a] white glow, silver glow, pearl glow around my body.
I was beautiful. I had no mirror to see my face, but I … [could] feel my face was pretty, I saw my arms and my legs had a white, simple, long dress of light. … My voice was as a teenager mixed with [the] tone of voice as a child. …
Suddenly a light brighter than my body [approached] me. … His light was making me blind. …
He said in a very … fine voice, “You are not going to be able to continue.” …
I remember talking his same language with my mind, he spoke with his mind too.
[As I cried because I didn’t want to go back,] he picked me up, held me. … He was quiet the whole time, gave me strength. I felt love and energy. [There] Is no love and strength in this world [to] compare to that. …
[He said:] “You were sent here by mistake, somebody’s mistake. You need to go back. … To come here, you need to accomplish many things. … Try to help several people.” …
In the Morgue
I opened my eyes, everything around was metal doors, people on metal tables, one body had another body on top. I recognized the place: I was in the morgue.
I felt ice on my eyelashes, my body was cold. could not feel anything. … [I wasn’t] even able to move my neck or talk.
I was feeling sleepy. … [Two or three hours] later, I heard voices, [and I] opened my eyes again. I saw two male nurses. … I knew I had to make … eye contact with one of them. I barely had strength to blink my eyes again and again, but I did. [It] took a lot of energy.
[One of the nurses looked] at me, scared, … [telling] his partner: “Look, look, she is moving her eyes!” Laughing, [he] said, “Let’s go, this place is scary.”
Inside of me, I was screaming, “Please, don’t leave!”
I didn’t close my eyes until the nurses came, and doctors. All I heard is [someone say], “Who did this? Who sent this patient to the morgue? The doctors were mad. I closed my eyes until was sure I was far away from that place. I didn’t wake up until three or four days later.
I had episodes of sleeping for long periods of time. … I could not talk. [On] day five, I began to move [my] arms and legs … again. …
Doctors [explained] to me that I was sent there [to the morgue] by mistake. … They helped me to walk again, with therapy.
One of the things I learned is [there] is no time to waste doing the wrong things, we need to do everything good for our sake … [on] the other side. [It] is like a bank; you save that much, you will get that much at the end.
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
WTF WERE THOSE PERVERTS DOING THERE BAN Christians pro life and this was fine
- Attachments
-
- ScreenHunter 1783.png (282.84 KiB) Viewed 570 times
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
Sex & The Final Christian Generation
The sexual chaos and idolatry conquered by the early church has come roaring back -- and today's Christians don't know what time it is
https://www.theamericanconservative.com ... eneration/
The sexual chaos and idolatry conquered by the early church has come roaring back -- and today's Christians don't know what time it is
https://www.theamericanconservative.com ... eneration/
- Attachments
-
- ScreenHunter 1916.png (1.13 MiB) Viewed 543 times
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine safety among elderly persons aged 65 years and older
65 elderly !!!!!! Indeed!
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 0X22014931
65 elderly !!!!!! Indeed!
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 0X22014931
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
It is very worth viewing it has quite a lot of C.S. Lewis's line of thinking and being aware. Please read C.S Lewis Mere Christianity if you have not already--
I would only disagree with Tucker in 1 aspect ---The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom-- in all fairness He does not claim theological prowess
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/bl ... ore-241065
I would only disagree with Tucker in 1 aspect ---The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom-- in all fairness He does not claim theological prowess
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/bl ... ore-241065
- Attachments
-
- ScreenHunter 1955.png (235.44 KiB) Viewed 521 times
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
And here we are...
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blo ... is-corrupt
Throughout the agencies of our federal government, an important function is to issue data and information about the state of the country. These data cover a vast array of topics such as population, demographics, income and poverty, the state of the economy, the GDP, employment and unemployment, activities of foreign adversaries, weather and climate, energy production and use, and much, much more. The Congress and states use this information in making important public policy decisions, and the people use it to make decisions for their everyday lives. Not the least of those decisions is how to vote.
So is the information issued by the government basically honest and reliable for important decisions? Or, instead, is the output of official information cynically manipulated and corrupted by a government interested mainly in perpetuating and increasing its own power? And given that the federal bureaucracy is 90+% Democrat in political orientation, to what extent does that bureaucracy manipulate the information it issues to further the election of Democrats?
The evidence of data manipulation in favor of Democrats is so pervasive that we have to assume that essentially all information put out by the government is corrupt.
The instances of blatant manipulation of information by government personnel are way too clear and way too widespread to be ignored. What is now being called the “Twitter files” — shocking evidence of the FBI working with a big tech company to limit the circulation of information about corruption by one of the presidential candidates in the run-up to the 2020 election — is just one of the latest examples. Let’s have a review of some others:
Manipulation of temperature data to support the narrative of human-caused climate change.
Long-time readers here are undoubtedly familiar with my series, now of some 30 parts, on what I call the Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time. The headline refers to the alteration by U.S. bureaucrats of historical climate records to make it appear that temperatures have closely tracked the ongoing increase in CO2 in the atmosphere, when in fact the actual temperature readings show the opposite. The U.S. climate bureaucracies NASA and NOAA regularly put out excited press releases about the most recent month or year being the “hottest on record,” or something like that. But anybody can go to past information releases to find that those statements only hold if one accepts alteration of prior information to support the narrative.
My October 20, 2020 post contained the ultimate smoking gun: two NASA charts of U.S. temperatures, one from 1999 and the other from 2019, clearly showing the alteration of early-year temperatures to support the claim that the most recent years are the warmest. Here are those two charts:
see below
In NASA’s data in 1999, 1934 was the warmest year in the U.S. temperature record, about 0.6 deg C (1 deg F) warmer than 1998; 1921, 1931 and 1953 were also warmer than 1998. By 2019, 1998 had somehow become the warmest year, through the magical cooling of the earlier years. And thus do we get a claim that there is some kind of dangerous warming going on that requires a full transformation of the U.S. and world energy system, all under the direction of the all-knowing bureaucrats.
Manipulation of poverty data to support demands for ever-increasing amounts of anti-poverty programs and funding
Look under my tag for Poverty, and you will find one post after another detailing how government poverty statistics showing high rates of poverty in the U.S. are used to support advocacy for increasing programs and funding supposedly to reduce the poverty; and then after the programs and funding are increased the measured poverty never goes down. We’re now up to well over $1 trillion per year in anti-poverty funding in the U.S. (all levels of government), and the official “poverty rate” as measured is right around the same place it was when the War on Poverty started back in the 1960s.
How is this possible? The very simple trick is that the government “anti-poverty” funding never gets counted when official poverty is measured The statistics are very intentionally and cynically manipulated to be misused to advocate for growing government programs and dependency.
The latest iteration of this scam has been going on for the last several months, and continues in the so-called Omnibus bill even now making its way through Congress, in the form of a vastly expanded child tax credit. Claims are everywhere, including from President Biden personally, that the expanded child tax credit has or will cut child poverty in the U.S. “in half,” or something in that range. A release from the Census Bureau itself on September 13 bragged that the expanded child tax credit had “contributed to a 46% decline in child poverty since 2020,” to a rate of only 5.2%.
But by October 4 the Census Bureau was back to its old tricks:
The child poverty rate (for people under age 18) was 16.9% in 2021, 4.2 percentage points higher than the national rate. . . .
Wait a minute — what happened? Easy — they keep two sets of books on the “poverty” rate, the better to manipulate the gullible and under-informed public. Here they just reverted to the other measure of “poverty” where tax credits don’t count when they want to run up big “poverty” figures to support advocacy for yet more government spending and programs.
Try looking through that October 4 release to see if you can find any mention that they were bragging just a few weeks previously about the clild poverty rate having been reduced to 5.2%. It’s not there.
Manipulation of employment figures in the run-up to the 2022 mid-term election
John Hinderaker at PowerLine yesterday has yet another instance of blatant government manipulation of official statistics to support election of Democrats, this one coming out of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In early July 2022 the BLS reported a big number for job growth in the second quarter (April to June) of over 1 million jobs. That supposed job growth became the centerpiece of President Biden’s economic message for the midterms. The Hill quoted Biden on July 28 as follows:
Our job market remains historically strong, with . . . more than 1 million jobs created in the second quarter alone.
On December 13 the Research Department of the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank came out with revised figures for second quarter job growth:
In the aggregate, 10,500 net new jobs were added during the [March to June] period rather than the 1,121,500 jobs estimated by the sum of the states; the U.S. CES [Current Employment Statistics, put out by BLS] estimated net growth of 1,047,000 jobs for the period.
Off by a factor of about 100. Oh well, it’s now December, and we’re well past the election.
Does any agency in the U.S. government put out honest information today? Maybe, but how would you ever know? At this point you must assume that that absolutely everything is corrupted, in the particular direction of supporting election of Democrats and further growth of the government.
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blo ... is-corrupt
Throughout the agencies of our federal government, an important function is to issue data and information about the state of the country. These data cover a vast array of topics such as population, demographics, income and poverty, the state of the economy, the GDP, employment and unemployment, activities of foreign adversaries, weather and climate, energy production and use, and much, much more. The Congress and states use this information in making important public policy decisions, and the people use it to make decisions for their everyday lives. Not the least of those decisions is how to vote.
So is the information issued by the government basically honest and reliable for important decisions? Or, instead, is the output of official information cynically manipulated and corrupted by a government interested mainly in perpetuating and increasing its own power? And given that the federal bureaucracy is 90+% Democrat in political orientation, to what extent does that bureaucracy manipulate the information it issues to further the election of Democrats?
The evidence of data manipulation in favor of Democrats is so pervasive that we have to assume that essentially all information put out by the government is corrupt.
The instances of blatant manipulation of information by government personnel are way too clear and way too widespread to be ignored. What is now being called the “Twitter files” — shocking evidence of the FBI working with a big tech company to limit the circulation of information about corruption by one of the presidential candidates in the run-up to the 2020 election — is just one of the latest examples. Let’s have a review of some others:
Manipulation of temperature data to support the narrative of human-caused climate change.
Long-time readers here are undoubtedly familiar with my series, now of some 30 parts, on what I call the Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time. The headline refers to the alteration by U.S. bureaucrats of historical climate records to make it appear that temperatures have closely tracked the ongoing increase in CO2 in the atmosphere, when in fact the actual temperature readings show the opposite. The U.S. climate bureaucracies NASA and NOAA regularly put out excited press releases about the most recent month or year being the “hottest on record,” or something like that. But anybody can go to past information releases to find that those statements only hold if one accepts alteration of prior information to support the narrative.
My October 20, 2020 post contained the ultimate smoking gun: two NASA charts of U.S. temperatures, one from 1999 and the other from 2019, clearly showing the alteration of early-year temperatures to support the claim that the most recent years are the warmest. Here are those two charts:
see below
In NASA’s data in 1999, 1934 was the warmest year in the U.S. temperature record, about 0.6 deg C (1 deg F) warmer than 1998; 1921, 1931 and 1953 were also warmer than 1998. By 2019, 1998 had somehow become the warmest year, through the magical cooling of the earlier years. And thus do we get a claim that there is some kind of dangerous warming going on that requires a full transformation of the U.S. and world energy system, all under the direction of the all-knowing bureaucrats.
Manipulation of poverty data to support demands for ever-increasing amounts of anti-poverty programs and funding
Look under my tag for Poverty, and you will find one post after another detailing how government poverty statistics showing high rates of poverty in the U.S. are used to support advocacy for increasing programs and funding supposedly to reduce the poverty; and then after the programs and funding are increased the measured poverty never goes down. We’re now up to well over $1 trillion per year in anti-poverty funding in the U.S. (all levels of government), and the official “poverty rate” as measured is right around the same place it was when the War on Poverty started back in the 1960s.
How is this possible? The very simple trick is that the government “anti-poverty” funding never gets counted when official poverty is measured The statistics are very intentionally and cynically manipulated to be misused to advocate for growing government programs and dependency.
The latest iteration of this scam has been going on for the last several months, and continues in the so-called Omnibus bill even now making its way through Congress, in the form of a vastly expanded child tax credit. Claims are everywhere, including from President Biden personally, that the expanded child tax credit has or will cut child poverty in the U.S. “in half,” or something in that range. A release from the Census Bureau itself on September 13 bragged that the expanded child tax credit had “contributed to a 46% decline in child poverty since 2020,” to a rate of only 5.2%.
But by October 4 the Census Bureau was back to its old tricks:
The child poverty rate (for people under age 18) was 16.9% in 2021, 4.2 percentage points higher than the national rate. . . .
Wait a minute — what happened? Easy — they keep two sets of books on the “poverty” rate, the better to manipulate the gullible and under-informed public. Here they just reverted to the other measure of “poverty” where tax credits don’t count when they want to run up big “poverty” figures to support advocacy for yet more government spending and programs.
Try looking through that October 4 release to see if you can find any mention that they were bragging just a few weeks previously about the clild poverty rate having been reduced to 5.2%. It’s not there.
Manipulation of employment figures in the run-up to the 2022 mid-term election
John Hinderaker at PowerLine yesterday has yet another instance of blatant government manipulation of official statistics to support election of Democrats, this one coming out of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In early July 2022 the BLS reported a big number for job growth in the second quarter (April to June) of over 1 million jobs. That supposed job growth became the centerpiece of President Biden’s economic message for the midterms. The Hill quoted Biden on July 28 as follows:
Our job market remains historically strong, with . . . more than 1 million jobs created in the second quarter alone.
On December 13 the Research Department of the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank came out with revised figures for second quarter job growth:
In the aggregate, 10,500 net new jobs were added during the [March to June] period rather than the 1,121,500 jobs estimated by the sum of the states; the U.S. CES [Current Employment Statistics, put out by BLS] estimated net growth of 1,047,000 jobs for the period.
Off by a factor of about 100. Oh well, it’s now December, and we’re well past the election.
Does any agency in the U.S. government put out honest information today? Maybe, but how would you ever know? At this point you must assume that that absolutely everything is corrupted, in the particular direction of supporting election of Democrats and further growth of the government.
- Attachments
-
- ScreenHunter 2014.png (363.87 KiB) Viewed 489 times
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
DITTO!
THE MALTHUSIAN MOMENT?
by
James D. Veltmeyer, MD
Thomas Malthus was a British economist of the late 18th and early 19th century whose writings became famous for their concern over the dangers of overpopulation. A pessimist, Malthus believed human population would always outstrip the ability of food production to keep pace, inevitably resulting in scarcity, famine, and death. For Malthus, the only way society could enjoy prosperity and happiness was through limits on population growth.
Malthusianism was long ago discredited as a viable economic theory because subsequent developments in agriculture, industry, and technology proved that such fears of population growth were completely unwarranted. Improved farming practices, seed science, and new technologies permitted more and more food to be produced by a smaller number of farmers on fewer acres. In the United States today, for example, less than 2% of Americans are employed in agriculture, compared to 70% in 1840. The number of farms today is about 2 million compared to 7 million at the height of the Great Depression in the 1930s. The horn of plenty produced just by American agriculture has enabled Americans to be the best fed people in world history, despite a population that has itself nearly doubled since 1960. In fact, the United States alone produces so much food, it has to be exported and the problem most farmers normally face is falling prices due to overproduction.
This abundance of food holds true for much of the rest of the world. According to the United Nations, global malnutrition rates dropped dramatically, from 15% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2019. This occurred as the world population increased from 6.1 billion to 7.7 billion, an increase of 26%.
Yet, despite the facts consistently discrediting and undercutting their thesis, the so-called “Limits to Growth” crowd persists in predicting gloom and doom until the world’s population is brought to heel.
Whether it be Stanford professors like Paul Ehrlich, computer trillionaires like Bill Gates, or would-be world rulers like the King of Davos, Klaus Schwab, human beings and their capacity to “be fruitful and multiply” is viewed as one of the greatest crises which ever faced humanity. In fact, in 2010, Gates gave a speech in which he bemoaned the fact that the world population was 6.8 billion and on the march to 9 billion. He said if we do a “really great job” on “new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services,” that number could be lowered by 10% to 15%. That would mean reducing the world population by up to 1,350,000,000. Gates actually said this and the video is still up on YouTube.
In 2017, NBC News published a commentary entitled “Science proves kids are bad for Earth. Morality suggests we stop having them.” The thesis is that having children impacts climate change by increasing the so-called “carbon footprint.” So, it isn’t just cow flatulence that is increasing CO2 emissions. It’s babies too! Aside from the fact that there has never been any conclusive scientific evidence that man is mostly responsible for climate change ( which used to be called “global warming” until the econuts discovered that there was just as much “global cooling” going on in parts of the planet ), the very idea that the globalist ruling elites are still clinging to an old, repudiated theory by a long-buried British economist is concerning. It’s not just concerning, it is reflective of a deeper, more disturbing obsession with controlling the world’s population.
Whether it’s Agenda 2021, Global 2000, or the pronouncements of the World Economic Forum or the Club of Rome, the world’s leading totalitarians are determined to dramatically reduce the number of people on earth. Many nations have already been doing this for decades. Communist China, for example, with its one-child and forced abortion policies. In fact, most Communist dictatorships seem to like abortion-on-demand. Maybe it makes the number of people more manageable for ruling them. The United Nations, of course, has long been funding contraception and abortion policies on the black and brown people of the Third World, whom they consider “useless eaters.” And, the United States government has long subsidized these UN policies, except perhaps under President Trump.
Bill Gates, of course, has been a major funder of Planned Parenthood and its chain of abortion mills across the country. And, so has the U.S. taxpayer, especially under Democrat administrations, like Senile Joe’s. The Supreme Court in 1973 did its part in its infamous Roe v. Wade decision, eliminating 63 million unborn children who not only would not have been a burden on our economy, but a boon to it by boosting our GDP and potentially saving the Social Security system from bankruptcy.
It is curious that Gates mentioned “new vaccines” as helping to lower the world’s population. Wouldn’t you think it would be the opposite? Wouldn’t vaccines make people less vulnerable to certain diseases like COVID-19 and less likely to die? What was Gates really talking about? Could it be that certain vaccines have been developed to kill people? Perish the thought, that’s just conspiracy talk! Yet, why – in the wake of the mass COVID inoculations, do we see the rise of something called Sudden Adult Death Syndrome ( SADS )? Why are so many young male athletes suddenly dying of blood clots, heart inflammation or strokes? Why are there so many miscarriages and spontaneous abortions happening in vaxxed females? Why does an Israeli study show a dramatic drop in sperm counts among vaxxed males? Why do life insurance companies show a dramatic increase in claims since the COVID vaccines became widespread? Something is going on out there and the lamestream media refuses to cover it.
At the same time, transgenderism, chemical castration, and genital mutilation seem to be the major priorities of the Democrat Party and the radical Left. Why is the Left encouraging young males to destroy their ability to reproduce? Why have the public schools embraced the teaching of gender identity in order to confuse children and persuade them to “transition,” which may eventually lead to suicide and the inability of young people to forge healthy sexual relationships and marriages?
Finally, to top it off, we are now hearing talk of widespread global food shortages – including right here in the U.S. – in the coming months due to the explosion in the cost of fertilizer and diesel fuel and supply chain problems resulting from the pandemic, the war in Ukraine, and Joe Biden’s destructive economic policies. The word “famine” is not far off and it’s another great way to depopulate the planet.
It almost sounds like part of a plan doesn’t it? No, of course not. That would be conspiracy talk! And, we know that, contrary to what President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, nothing in politics really happens on purpose or is planned! Everything in politics is just coincidental. Or is it? At the very least, we can say that perhaps with Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab calling the shots, the Malthusian Moment has finally arrived.
THE MALTHUSIAN MOMENT?
by
James D. Veltmeyer, MD
Thomas Malthus was a British economist of the late 18th and early 19th century whose writings became famous for their concern over the dangers of overpopulation. A pessimist, Malthus believed human population would always outstrip the ability of food production to keep pace, inevitably resulting in scarcity, famine, and death. For Malthus, the only way society could enjoy prosperity and happiness was through limits on population growth.
Malthusianism was long ago discredited as a viable economic theory because subsequent developments in agriculture, industry, and technology proved that such fears of population growth were completely unwarranted. Improved farming practices, seed science, and new technologies permitted more and more food to be produced by a smaller number of farmers on fewer acres. In the United States today, for example, less than 2% of Americans are employed in agriculture, compared to 70% in 1840. The number of farms today is about 2 million compared to 7 million at the height of the Great Depression in the 1930s. The horn of plenty produced just by American agriculture has enabled Americans to be the best fed people in world history, despite a population that has itself nearly doubled since 1960. In fact, the United States alone produces so much food, it has to be exported and the problem most farmers normally face is falling prices due to overproduction.
This abundance of food holds true for much of the rest of the world. According to the United Nations, global malnutrition rates dropped dramatically, from 15% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2019. This occurred as the world population increased from 6.1 billion to 7.7 billion, an increase of 26%.
Yet, despite the facts consistently discrediting and undercutting their thesis, the so-called “Limits to Growth” crowd persists in predicting gloom and doom until the world’s population is brought to heel.
Whether it be Stanford professors like Paul Ehrlich, computer trillionaires like Bill Gates, or would-be world rulers like the King of Davos, Klaus Schwab, human beings and their capacity to “be fruitful and multiply” is viewed as one of the greatest crises which ever faced humanity. In fact, in 2010, Gates gave a speech in which he bemoaned the fact that the world population was 6.8 billion and on the march to 9 billion. He said if we do a “really great job” on “new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services,” that number could be lowered by 10% to 15%. That would mean reducing the world population by up to 1,350,000,000. Gates actually said this and the video is still up on YouTube.
In 2017, NBC News published a commentary entitled “Science proves kids are bad for Earth. Morality suggests we stop having them.” The thesis is that having children impacts climate change by increasing the so-called “carbon footprint.” So, it isn’t just cow flatulence that is increasing CO2 emissions. It’s babies too! Aside from the fact that there has never been any conclusive scientific evidence that man is mostly responsible for climate change ( which used to be called “global warming” until the econuts discovered that there was just as much “global cooling” going on in parts of the planet ), the very idea that the globalist ruling elites are still clinging to an old, repudiated theory by a long-buried British economist is concerning. It’s not just concerning, it is reflective of a deeper, more disturbing obsession with controlling the world’s population.
Whether it’s Agenda 2021, Global 2000, or the pronouncements of the World Economic Forum or the Club of Rome, the world’s leading totalitarians are determined to dramatically reduce the number of people on earth. Many nations have already been doing this for decades. Communist China, for example, with its one-child and forced abortion policies. In fact, most Communist dictatorships seem to like abortion-on-demand. Maybe it makes the number of people more manageable for ruling them. The United Nations, of course, has long been funding contraception and abortion policies on the black and brown people of the Third World, whom they consider “useless eaters.” And, the United States government has long subsidized these UN policies, except perhaps under President Trump.
Bill Gates, of course, has been a major funder of Planned Parenthood and its chain of abortion mills across the country. And, so has the U.S. taxpayer, especially under Democrat administrations, like Senile Joe’s. The Supreme Court in 1973 did its part in its infamous Roe v. Wade decision, eliminating 63 million unborn children who not only would not have been a burden on our economy, but a boon to it by boosting our GDP and potentially saving the Social Security system from bankruptcy.
It is curious that Gates mentioned “new vaccines” as helping to lower the world’s population. Wouldn’t you think it would be the opposite? Wouldn’t vaccines make people less vulnerable to certain diseases like COVID-19 and less likely to die? What was Gates really talking about? Could it be that certain vaccines have been developed to kill people? Perish the thought, that’s just conspiracy talk! Yet, why – in the wake of the mass COVID inoculations, do we see the rise of something called Sudden Adult Death Syndrome ( SADS )? Why are so many young male athletes suddenly dying of blood clots, heart inflammation or strokes? Why are there so many miscarriages and spontaneous abortions happening in vaxxed females? Why does an Israeli study show a dramatic drop in sperm counts among vaxxed males? Why do life insurance companies show a dramatic increase in claims since the COVID vaccines became widespread? Something is going on out there and the lamestream media refuses to cover it.
At the same time, transgenderism, chemical castration, and genital mutilation seem to be the major priorities of the Democrat Party and the radical Left. Why is the Left encouraging young males to destroy their ability to reproduce? Why have the public schools embraced the teaching of gender identity in order to confuse children and persuade them to “transition,” which may eventually lead to suicide and the inability of young people to forge healthy sexual relationships and marriages?
Finally, to top it off, we are now hearing talk of widespread global food shortages – including right here in the U.S. – in the coming months due to the explosion in the cost of fertilizer and diesel fuel and supply chain problems resulting from the pandemic, the war in Ukraine, and Joe Biden’s destructive economic policies. The word “famine” is not far off and it’s another great way to depopulate the planet.
It almost sounds like part of a plan doesn’t it? No, of course not. That would be conspiracy talk! And, we know that, contrary to what President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, nothing in politics really happens on purpose or is planned! Everything in politics is just coincidental. Or is it? At the very least, we can say that perhaps with Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab calling the shots, the Malthusian Moment has finally arrived.
- TimGDixon
- Posts: 6073
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 12:00 pm
- Has thanked: 833 times
- Been thanked: 1036 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
Let's hear it for the best doc around this town.cablejohn45 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 5:27 pm DITTO!
THE MALTHUSIAN MOMENT?
by
James D. Veltmeyer, MD
Thomas Malthus was a British economist of the late 18th and early 19th century whose writings became famous for their concern over the dangers of overpopulation. A pessimist, Malthus believed human population would always outstrip the ability of food production to keep pace, inevitably resulting in scarcity, famine, and death. For Malthus, the only way society could enjoy prosperity and happiness was through limits on population growth.
Malthusianism was long ago discredited as a viable economic theory because subsequent developments in agriculture, industry, and technology proved that such fears of population growth were completely unwarranted. Improved farming practices, seed science, and new technologies permitted more and more food to be produced by a smaller number of farmers on fewer acres. In the United States today, for example, less than 2% of Americans are employed in agriculture, compared to 70% in 1840. The number of farms today is about 2 million compared to 7 million at the height of the Great Depression in the 1930s. The horn of plenty produced just by American agriculture has enabled Americans to be the best fed people in world history, despite a population that has itself nearly doubled since 1960. In fact, the United States alone produces so much food, it has to be exported and the problem most farmers normally face is falling prices due to overproduction.
This abundance of food holds true for much of the rest of the world. According to the United Nations, global malnutrition rates dropped dramatically, from 15% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2019. This occurred as the world population increased from 6.1 billion to 7.7 billion, an increase of 26%.
Yet, despite the facts consistently discrediting and undercutting their thesis, the so-called “Limits to Growth” crowd persists in predicting gloom and doom until the world’s population is brought to heel.
Whether it be Stanford professors like Paul Ehrlich, computer trillionaires like Bill Gates, or would-be world rulers like the King of Davos, Klaus Schwab, human beings and their capacity to “be fruitful and multiply” is viewed as one of the greatest crises which ever faced humanity. In fact, in 2010, Gates gave a speech in which he bemoaned the fact that the world population was 6.8 billion and on the march to 9 billion. He said if we do a “really great job” on “new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services,” that number could be lowered by 10% to 15%. That would mean reducing the world population by up to 1,350,000,000. Gates actually said this and the video is still up on YouTube.
In 2017, NBC News published a commentary entitled “Science proves kids are bad for Earth. Morality suggests we stop having them.” The thesis is that having children impacts climate change by increasing the so-called “carbon footprint.” So, it isn’t just cow flatulence that is increasing CO2 emissions. It’s babies too! Aside from the fact that there has never been any conclusive scientific evidence that man is mostly responsible for climate change ( which used to be called “global warming” until the econuts discovered that there was just as much “global cooling” going on in parts of the planet ), the very idea that the globalist ruling elites are still clinging to an old, repudiated theory by a long-buried British economist is concerning. It’s not just concerning, it is reflective of a deeper, more disturbing obsession with controlling the world’s population.
Whether it’s Agenda 2021, Global 2000, or the pronouncements of the World Economic Forum or the Club of Rome, the world’s leading totalitarians are determined to dramatically reduce the number of people on earth. Many nations have already been doing this for decades. Communist China, for example, with its one-child and forced abortion policies. In fact, most Communist dictatorships seem to like abortion-on-demand. Maybe it makes the number of people more manageable for ruling them. The United Nations, of course, has long been funding contraception and abortion policies on the black and brown people of the Third World, whom they consider “useless eaters.” And, the United States government has long subsidized these UN policies, except perhaps under President Trump.
Bill Gates, of course, has been a major funder of Planned Parenthood and its chain of abortion mills across the country. And, so has the U.S. taxpayer, especially under Democrat administrations, like Senile Joe’s. The Supreme Court in 1973 did its part in its infamous Roe v. Wade decision, eliminating 63 million unborn children who not only would not have been a burden on our economy, but a boon to it by boosting our GDP and potentially saving the Social Security system from bankruptcy.
It is curious that Gates mentioned “new vaccines” as helping to lower the world’s population. Wouldn’t you think it would be the opposite? Wouldn’t vaccines make people less vulnerable to certain diseases like COVID-19 and less likely to die? What was Gates really talking about? Could it be that certain vaccines have been developed to kill people? Perish the thought, that’s just conspiracy talk! Yet, why – in the wake of the mass COVID inoculations, do we see the rise of something called Sudden Adult Death Syndrome ( SADS )? Why are so many young male athletes suddenly dying of blood clots, heart inflammation or strokes? Why are there so many miscarriages and spontaneous abortions happening in vaxxed females? Why does an Israeli study show a dramatic drop in sperm counts among vaxxed males? Why do life insurance companies show a dramatic increase in claims since the COVID vaccines became widespread? Something is going on out there and the lamestream media refuses to cover it.
At the same time, transgenderism, chemical castration, and genital mutilation seem to be the major priorities of the Democrat Party and the radical Left. Why is the Left encouraging young males to destroy their ability to reproduce? Why have the public schools embraced the teaching of gender identity in order to confuse children and persuade them to “transition,” which may eventually lead to suicide and the inability of young people to forge healthy sexual relationships and marriages?
Finally, to top it off, we are now hearing talk of widespread global food shortages – including right here in the U.S. – in the coming months due to the explosion in the cost of fertilizer and diesel fuel and supply chain problems resulting from the pandemic, the war in Ukraine, and Joe Biden’s destructive economic policies. The word “famine” is not far off and it’s another great way to depopulate the planet.
It almost sounds like part of a plan doesn’t it? No, of course not. That would be conspiracy talk! And, we know that, contrary to what President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, nothing in politics really happens on purpose or is planned! Everything in politics is just coincidental. Or is it? At the very least, we can say that perhaps with Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab calling the shots, the Malthusian Moment has finally arrived.
“...never interrupt your enemy when he is making mistakes...”
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
Here is another knee slapper for you
https://www.worldtribune.com/greatest-h ... man-lives/
https://www.worldtribune.com/greatest-h ... man-lives/
- Attachments
-
- ScreenHunter 2093.png (29.62 KiB) Viewed 427 times
- cablejohn45
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:45 pm
- Location: K-T TX
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: CHEERS TO HEALTH
note the date I passed out FLCCC protocols at the time I still have copies in my bible case
https://www.worldtribune.com/greatest-h ... for-covid/
https://www.worldtribune.com/greatest-h ... for-covid/
- Attachments
-
- ScreenHunter 2094.png (30.31 KiB) Viewed 426 times